Trust UX — Design Specification (P8 Prototype)

How attribution renders, how event-ledger flags are surfaced, and how click-through to sources works in Quartz output.

1. Attribution Rendering (DD21)

In Markdown (vault)

- ⊕ "Paper oil manipulations merely buy time" [@Stuart Hardy] (→ [[slack-digest-2026-04-03]])

In Quartz (published site)

  • The [@Stuart Hardy] renders as a styled inline tag (no link — members are not linkable entities)
  • The (→ [[slack-digest-2026-04-03]]) renders as a clickable link to the source-summary page
  • The ⊕/⊖/⚖ icons render with colour: green/red/amber
  • Hover behaviour: none at MVP (DD21 — “no hover popovers or provenance badges in MVP”)

Click-through chain

Theme page claim → source-summary page → raw source (if available)
  • Source-summary pages (in wiki/sources/) contain extracted key claims + metadata
  • Raw sources (in raw/) may be linked from source-summaries but are NOT published to Quartz (raw Slack messages, PDFs, etc. stay private)
  • If a raw source is a Slack message: link to Slack directly (requires Slack auth)
  • If a raw source is an R2 doc: link to R2 viewer or embed excerpt in source-summary

2. Event Ledger Surfacing (DD22)

On theme pages

The “Events reckoned with” section renders as a timeline at the bottom of each theme page:

📅 2026-03-12 — Hormuz closure Day 12: Iranian leader declares Strait closed — reckoned
📅 2026-03-14 — R051 trade structure deployed at 82% closure probability — reckoned
📅 2026-04-04 — Brent above $129 — ⚠ UNRECKONED

Soft flags (unreckoned events)

Rendered as a banner at the top of the theme page, below the one-line summary:

⚠ This page has not reckoned with: Brent above $129 (2026-04-04), US Navy escort deadline lapsed (end of March)
  • Banner is amber/yellow, not red — it’s a freshness signal, not an error
  • Banner links to the events ledger section for detail
  • In the daily digest, unreckoned events surface as a separate section (see P6 prototype)

In Quartz

  • The banner renders as a Quartz callout/admonition block (amber)
  • The timeline renders as a styled list with date badges

3. Disagreement Rendering (DD21)

Arguments-and-rebuttals format

### Is the V-shaped recovery thesis valid?

**For (V-shape):**
- WTI-Brent spread narrowing suggests limited duration pricing [@Gaetan Warzee]
- Historical precedent: every Hormuz threat since 1984 resolved without permanent closure

**Against (structural):**
- Physical bypass capacity (3.1M bpd) cannot close 17.5M bpd deficit [@Stuart Hardy]
- "Paper oil manipulations merely buy time" — FFTT [@Stuart Hardy]
  • Bullets, never paragraphs (DD21)
  • Each side attributed to specific members
  • No editorial verdict inline — the thesis health dashboard provides the aggregate view

4. Quantitative Context Rendering (DD33)

Signal snapshots

📊 Quantitative Context
| Signal | Value | As of | Status |
|--------|-------|-------|--------|
| Brent crude | $129.34 | 2026-04-04 | ⚠ STALE (6h budget) |
| Brent-WTI spread | $44 → ~$32 (narrowing) | 2026-04-04 | ⚠ STALE |
| BWET (tanker ETF) | +243% YTD | 2026-03-18 | ⚠ STALE |
| Turbulence (composite) | — | — | NOT CONNECTED |
| Credit Composite | — | — | NOT CONNECTED |
  • Stale values show the staleness budget and last-verified timestamp
  • NOT CONNECTED signals are listed but greyed out — they exist in the signal registry but aren’t yet wired to this theme
  • In production, live values would be fetched at Quartz build time (DD19)

5. Quartz-Specific Decisions

DecisionChoiceRationale
Theme page URL pattern/themes/iran-hormuz-supply-shock/Matches vault slug
Source page URL pattern/sources/slack-digest-2026-04-03/Matches vault slug
Entity page URL pattern/entities/stuart-hardy/Matches vault slug
Landing pageindex.md/DD36 — index.md is the published landing page
NavigationAuto-generated from index.md category tablesNo manual nav config
SearchQuartz built-in full-text searchSufficient for MVP
AuthCloudflare Access (email allowlist)DD7 confirmed
Custom CSSMinimal — amber callouts for unreckoned events, coloured ⊕/⊖/⚖Keep default Quartz theme

6. What This Prototype Validates

After reviewing the P1–P7 prototypes through this trust UX lens:

  • Attribution works. The [@Name] + (→ [[source]]) pattern is readable and provides the click-through chain. No fancy UI needed at MVP.
  • Event ledger works. The soft-flag banner is clear and non-intrusive. The timeline section is scannable.
  • Disagreement rendering works. Arguments-and-rebuttals in bullets is much more readable than a wall of text. Member attribution on each side makes it social.
  • Freshness budget enforcement is the hard part. Every numerical value needs a last-verified timestamp and a budget. The lint loop (DD27 loop 4) must check this. At MVP, manual staleness flags are acceptable; automated live-fetch at Quartz build time is the target.